| No. |
Performance
indicator |
Themes |
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
|
1.
|
Quality
of the prior information to the kick-off meeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.1. |
Input
into the kick-off meeting by the project co-ordinator |
1.
Travel/hotel arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.
Content/organisation of kick-off meeting |
|
|
|
|
| 3.
Distribution of work among project partners |
|
|
|
|
| 4.
Time schedule |
|
|
|
|
| 2. |
Quality
of the transnational element |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.1. |
Input
into the kick-off meeting by all project partners |
1.
The extent to which the project co-ordinator (Verband Wiener Volksbildung) has
contributed to the kick-off meeting (overall impression)
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.
The extent to which the other project partners have contributed
to the kick-off meeting (overall impression, each partner has
played a role in the preparation and delivery of the kick-off
meeting according to an agreed prior division of roles and responsibilities). |
|
|
|
|
| 3.
The evidence of project partners sharing roles and responsibilities
during the kick-off meeting (overall impression of the collaborative
aproach and team work) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.2. |
Links
between the
aims of the kick-off meeting and the overall aims of the project
|
1.
Mutual understanding amongst the project partners about the
project targets and aims and the kick-off rationale.
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.
The short term objectives of the kick-off meeting (e.g. getting
to know all project partners face2face, group discussions, further
agreements on further timelines, tasks and milestones) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.
The long term objectives of the project (e.g. creating new VOLT and VOLL modules, including using itslearning as internal project platform, evaluation procedures) |
|
|
|
|
| 4.
Clear evidence in the kick-off programme of real synergy with
the overall objectives of the project (detailed discussion of institutional backgrounds, knowledge available, further steps etc.) |
|
|
|
|
| 3. |
Development
of positive attitudes towards Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.1. |
Promotion
of co-operation among project partners |
The
extent of opportunities for project partners to share information
about their own countries, varied education systems and methodologic
and didactic needs of the target group for the final project product
(modules on VLE) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.2. |
Promotion
of other languages among project partners |
1.
Extent and quality of the opportunities for the use of various
languages by all project partners (e.g. languages support by
the bi- and multi-lingual project partners)
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Evidence of strategies for overcoming language difficulties (handouts,
translations, explanations, use of visual aids (grids etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.3. |
Representation
from a variety of European countries |
The
extent to which a reasonable representation of project partners
from various countries has been achieved. |
|
|
|
|
| 4. |
Structure,
content and delivery of the kick-off meeting in Cracow |
|
|
|
|
|
| 4.1. |
Organisation
of kick-off meeting |
1.
Evidence of clear planning
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.
Realistic timescales |
|
|
|
|
| 4.2. |
Effectiveness
of content and appropriate range and balance of activities during
the kick-off meeting |
Relevant
mixture of activities
eg ice-breaking activities (presentations of all project partners
present), presentations (project content, financial overview
etc.),
methodological and didactic sessions,
discussions, talks, show&tell sessions (e.g. language learning products).
|
|
|
|
|
| 4.3. |
Effectiveness
of the delivery by the project co-ordinator |
1.
The project co-ordinator has the appropriate subject competence
and knowledge (e.g. a team with clearly distributed roles).
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.
They are good communicators with the necessary language skills. |
|
|
|
|
3.
They have had the appropriate technical and methodological experience
for delivering professional development of the kick-off meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
| 4.4. |
Effectiveness
of the delivery by the other project partners |
1.
The project partners have the appropriate subject competence
and knowledge with regard to their individual roles and responsibilities
within the project.
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.
They have the appropriate technical, methodological and didactic
experience for delivering professional development (with regard
to their individual roles and responsibilities). |
|
|
|
|
| 3.
They are good communicators with the necessary language skills. |
|
|
|
|
| 4.5. |
Effectiveness
of shared ownership of the kick-off meeting and the whole project |
1.
Evidence that the needs and expectations of the project partners
have been taken into account.
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.
Evidence that the project partners have had the opportunity to
contribute their own expertise (eg. in discussions, in show&tell
sessions). |
|
|
|
|
| 4.6. |
Effectiveness
of the process of monitoring and evaluation |
1.
Quality of the mechanism for evaluation both short term and long
term (e.g. monitoring tool: itslearning) |
|
|
|
|
| 2.
Evidence of assistance to project partners (e.g. Leonardo Evaluation Guide online, by email, itslearning tools; Motto: "Are we doing the right things? Are we doing the things right?") |
|
|
|
|
| 5. |
Materials,
resources and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
| 5.1. |
Provision
and suitability of materials, resources and equipment used during
the kick-off meeting |
1.
Evidence of appropriate prior information being issued to project
partners
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.
Relevance and quality of materials issued during the kick-off
meeting (e.g. overview of project finances, project documentation
and report system, handouts, check lists) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.
Sufficiency, range and suitability of other resources, including
ICT (e.g. presentation of the monitoring tool itslearning (EUROVOLT project area), WebCT, English Online). |
|
|
|
|
| 6. |
Quality
of the arrangements of the kick-off meeting in CRACOW |
|
|
|
|
|
| 6.1. |
Quality
and appropriateness of the domestic arrangements and the comfort
factor (concerning the kick-off meeting arranged by the project
co-ordinator)
|
1.
Attention to practical details and catering (e.g. timetable, how
to get to …, meals)
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.
Suitability of the lodging/working venue (Hotel Panorama) |
|
|
|
|
| 3.
Quality of Hotel Bydgoska |
|
|
|
|
